3pm - time to go home!

Surprisingly, it's not very often that the above is true.  As you can probably guess this post is in response, or about Michael Wilshaws newest statement in his role as Chief Inspector for OFSTED.  I have been reading a few different blog posts about it - Chips of Brookfield has made an excellent post - well worth a read.

My reaction comes down to a few points.

1. I have been teaching now for 10 years, and this is the first time in my career that I could name without really thinking about it the Chief Inspector.  I know that Mike Tomlinson did it years a go, and Chris Woodhead before him, but I did have to search Wikipedia to find out who was before Wilshaw.  (Christine Gilbert for those who didn't know like me!)  Surely that says something about how much attention he is getting from his press statements and interviews at the moment.  That is something I do not think is in the best interest of OFSTED.  OFSTED is not or should not be political at all.  All it should be interested in is seeing if schools, and teachers are doing their job properly, and that the government is getting value for money from them.  That is it.  I have no problem with inspections, as I do think that schools need to be held to account.  But when political interference occurs you then start getting problems where only above average is good enough!
2. This whole thing about going the extra mile.  Why should it be expected from any job that you have to go above and beyond the job you are paid for in order to progress?  I'm not saying that teachers should not go the extra mile, but surely it should not be expected.  If it is expected then it really shouldn't be called the extra mile, it should just be the job you get paid for.  
3. Wilshaws recent statement, like a lot of his others, focuses on negativity.  He focuses on the few teachers who might leave at 3 and do not do their job as well as others (Although, in 10 years of teaching I have not met many like that)  Why couldn't he say that a thank you, or look at the positive side of all the teachers who stay till 5pm, mark work and plan lessons in the evening, give up weekends and holidays to enrich students lives etc.  But these don't get a mention.  In saying what he did, in the way that he did, he reinforced the view that teachers are lazy, that they only work between 9-3 and have very long holidays.   
4. If he is serious about raising standards (and being Chief Inspector he should be) then belittling teachers and getting their backs up is not the right way to go about it.  I have often said that a happy staff will get better results.  By saying what he is saying, he is continuing the government attack on teachers and making them feel worthless or second class.  This will only end up in them losing motivation and commitment.  He needs to be building them up.  After 2 years of pay freezes, more contributions to pensions, more work and changes to the education system then I can remember, the GCSE situation this year then more negativity does not help.  Give teachers some praise for once and see what happens...

So, there you have it.  Not really much, but a few observations.  Lets hope that over the next few months Wilshaw decides to focus on his main job, not building himself up for a knighthood at the end of this parliament.